After drilling a stellar intercept of 136.8m @ 1.49g/t Au three weeks ago from the California Zone at their majority owned and operated (65/35 JV with Kootenay Silver) Cervantes gold project in Sonora, Mexico, Aztec Minerals Corp. (AZT: TSX-V, OTCQB: AZZTF) continues to publish more goodies, this time somewhat more normal highlights of 138.3m @ 0.58g/t Au and 54.7m @ 0.88g/t Au. Keep in mind most of the mineralization is oxidized, as Aztec is drilling the oxide cap of a porphyry target model, and anything over 0.40-0.45g/t Au oxidized with a decent strip ratio could be pretty economic at gold prices over US$1500/oz Au. Combined with other results reported in February like the 88.4m @ 1.1g/t Au and 167.2m @ 1.0g/t Au intercepts, Aztec seems to be firmly on its way to a significant maiden resource later this year.
All pictures are company material, unless stated otherwise.
All currencies are in US Dollars, unless stated otherwise.
Please note: the views, opinions, estimates, forecasts or predictions regarding Aztec’s resource potential are those of the author alone and do not represent views, opinions, estimates, forecasts or predictions of Aztec or Aztec’s management. Aztec has not in any way endorsed the views, opinions, estimates, forecasts or predictions provided by the author.
It seems the 2021-2022 Phase 2 drill program aimed at the California target at Cervantes is going as planned, as all assays coming back from the labs deliver strong results. The program itself has been completed now, with 26 RC holes totaling 4,649m drilled, assays of 10 holes reported, 4 holes were drilled at the Purisima target with limited success, with the balance of assays of 12 holes pending. The latest highlights are:
Reported lengths are apparent widths, not true widths, and the observed gold mineralization appears to be widely distributed in disseminations, fractures and veinlets within quartz-feldspar porphyry, feldspar porphyry stocks and related hydrothermal breccias. A section of CAL22-010 is shown below:
The goal is to expand the known mineralized envelope, resulting from the Phase I 2017-2018 drill program. Old (black collars) and new drilling (blue and red collars) can be seen on the following map:
As can be concluded, the Phase I program more or less focused on the top of the ridge, whereas Phase II is expanding north, south and east of this. The aforementioned stellar hole was CAL22-005, not too far away from CAL22-010. Gold mineralization in 010 was also extensive over 138m, but at almost one-third of the average grade of 005. The result of 005 was a surprise, as the nearby hole 18CER007 returned 122m @ 0.60g/t Au, and another hole close to 005, hole 18CER006, returned 170m @ 0.42g/t Au. For your convenience, here is the table of the Phase I program again, for comparison:
I wondered how these differences in grades could happen within a 30-50m distance, as oxide deposits are usually more continuous, and where this relatively high grade could come from, as the combination of length and average grade for 005 is unique. Could this be a local vein structure alongside a fault, or a feeder system? CEO Dyakowski had this to comment: “Further drilling is definitely required to understand the zonation and structural controls of the mineraliziation”.
Since the most eastern holes (CAL22-015, 016 and 019) haven’t returned results yet, it is armwaving at best, but with the recent and historic drill results I believe it is possible to conservatively estimate a mineralized envelope of 800x250x80x2.7=43.2Mt, and using an estimated average grade of 0.6g/t Au we would arrive at a hypothetical 833koz Au. If the remaining holes return intercepts alongside my estimated average range of 80m @ 0.60g/t Au or better, then the envelope could increase to a hypothetical 900x300x80x2.7=58.3Mt, generating an armwaving 1.125Moz Au. Let’s wait and see, as the results of 12 holes are on its way.
Besides going after more oxides, let’s not forget Aztec is also hunting large porphyry targets at depth at Cervantes. Deeper tests were planned at California target as part of this drill program to test the large IP chargeability anomaly at depth, but Aztec wasn’t able to get a deep test unfortunately, as the RC drill rig failed below the water table. Because of this the next round of drilling will include core drilling. The balance of the Phase 2 program tested an gold-in-soil anomaly at California Norte, and an outcrop at the Jasper target. The results are expected in the coming weeks.
Aztec is carrying out channel sampling and geologic mapping of the new drill roads at the moment at California, California Norte and Jasper, as well as to expand surface sampling and mapping on the property in general, in order to continue the 2021 phase 1 surface program. After this, all exploration results will likely be released, it will be most likely time to do another raise, and, contingent on the current program results, and available funds, management could plan additional drilling this spring season. As the results at California don’t exactly disappoint, it seems only logical to follow up with another drill program. CEO Dyakowski had this to say about it: “We are in the planning stages, but early thinking is to drill again in May June, with a combination of RC step outs, and Core deep drilling, approx. 5000m”.
As a reminder, the Cervantes oxides aren’t the only thing Aztec is looking to explore, as it is also planning a drill program for their Tombstone gold-silver oxide project (subject to a 75/25 JV with Aztec as the operator) in Arizona for the summer, also enabling them to go after large porphyry/CRD potential at depth at both projects. A diamond drill program is planned for the summer of this year, again contingent on available funds. This upcoming Phase 3 drill program will be designed to target deeper epithermal gold-silver mineralization below the Contention pit, and the coveted deep CRD silver-lead-zinc-copper-gold mineralization in Paleozoic limestones underlying the Bisbee Sediments.
Aztec Minerals is going from strength to strength with its Phase II drill program at the California target at Cervantes. Hole 004 already was much better than expected with 167m @ 1g/t Au from surface, but management surprised investors further with hole 005 (136.8m @1.48g/t Au), and continued to deliver very solid results as for example hole 010 returned 138m @ 0.53g/t Au. Since most mineralization appears to be oxidized and/or heap leachable with a very low strip ratio, and my hypothetical back of the envelope estimate points towards 800koz – 1.1Moz Au resource potential at a pretty economic grade, it seems Aztec is on its way to delineate their first company making asset. Which is not all, as they have 3 other opportunities. Stay tuned.
I hope you will find this article interesting and useful, and will have further interest in my upcoming articles on mining. To never miss a thing, please subscribe to my free newsletter at www.criticalinvestor.eu, in order to get an email notice of my new articles soon after they are published.
The author is not a registered investment advisor, and currently has a position in this stock. Aztec Minerals is a sponsoring company. All facts are to be checked by the reader. For more information go to www.aztecminerals.com and read the company’s profile and official documents on www.sedar.com, also for important risk disclosures. This article is provided for information purposes only, and is not intended to be investment advice of any kind, and all readers are encouraged to do their own due diligence, and talk to their own licensed investment advisors prior to making any investment decisions.
This newsletter/article is not meant to be investment advice, as Criticalinvestor.eu (from now on website, newsletter, and all persons or organisations directly related to it, for example but not limited to: owner, editor, the Seekingalpha author The Critical Investor, publisher, host company, employees, associates, sponsoring companies) is no registered investment advisor. Therefore it is not intended to meet your specific individual investment needs and it is not tailored to your personal financial situation. This newsletter/article reflects the personal and therefore subjective views and opinions of Criticalinvestor.eu and nothing else. The information herein may not be complete, up to date or correct. This newsletter/article is provided in good faith but without any legal responsibility or obligation to provide future updates.
Through use of this website and its newsletter viewing or using you agree to hold Criticalinvestor.eu harmless and to completely release them from any and all liability due to any and all loss (monetary or otherwise), damage (monetary or otherwise), or injury (monetary or otherwise) that you may incur.
You understand that Criticalinvestor.eu could be an investor and/or active trader, meaning that Criticalinvestor.eu could buy and sell certain securities at all times, more specific any or all of the stocks mentioned in own newsletters/articles and other own content like the Watchlist, Leveraged List, etc.
No part of this newsletter/article may be reproduced, copied, emailed, faxed, or distributed (in any form) without the express written permission of Criticalinvestor.eu. Everything contained herein is subject to international copyright protection. The full disclaimer can be found here.