Investors had to wait longer than expected for a big hit, but this week Tinka Resources (TK.V, TKRFF.US) proved that looking for substantially more mineralization first instead of preparing a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) is a viable strategy. The latest hole returned an amazing intercept of 10.4m grading 44.0% Zn at West Ayawilca, and what is particularly interesting is that management seems to be verifying their new theory on Ayawilca structural controls of geology with this result. The share price reacted accordingly, with an impressive 36% jump and 2.7M shares traded volume on the day of the announcement:
Figure 2. Share price Tinka Resources 1 year timeframe; source tmxmoney.com
Obviously lots of investors were impressed, and in my view rightly so, as this news could indicate potential for more and higher grade tonnage than anticipated. It seems a bottom has formed at C$0.40-0.45, even a bit lower than my forecasted C$0.46-0.48 from the April update, as the selling took longer than expected. Fortunately, this seems behind us now considering the massive volume, also against neutral to slightly negative sector sentiment. The potential implications for the resource and economics can be read in this article.
All presented tables are my own material, unless stated otherwise.
All pictures are company material, unless stated otherwise.
All currencies are in US Dollars, unless stated otherwise.
Please note: the views, opinions, estimates or forecasts regarding Tinka’s performance are those of the author alone and do not represent opinions, forecasts or predictions of Tinka or Tinka’s management. Tinka has not in any way endorsed the information, conclusions or recommendations provided by the author.
It was a pleasant surprise for Tinka Resources and investors to see an impressive intercept like 10.4m @44.0% Zn being returned by step out hole A18-129, as part of the current drill program at the Ayawilca project in Peru. Management started focusing more on expanding the high grade West and South zones as Zone 3 didn't return the results which were hoped for so far, and this seems to be the right move.
Despite all the noise about the latest and pretty large C$16.2M financing in March-April of this year, I am convinced that Tinka management knows very well what it is doing on the exploration side of things, and it shows so far. It is also always interesting and inspiring to talk to CEO Carman, and hear him elaborating about different geological concepts that might be tested. The Ayawilca deposits don't look very straightforward, but Carman and his team seem more than able to track them down.
Let's have a look at the latest drill result first, as mentioned in the latest news release. Six holes were reported from the West Ayawilca area (holes A18-117, 120 to 122, 126, 129) and one from the Central area (A18-127).
Key Highlights of the West Ayawilca Area:
An average grade of 44.0% Zn in a substantial intercept in sulphides is world class, and is only encountered in Tier I deposits like Arizona Mining's Taylor deposit (up to 31.7%Zn) and Ivanhoe Mines' Kipushi deposit (their average grade is even a freaky 34.9% Zn, twice as high as the next highest average grade zinc deposit, according to Wood Mackenzie). As this is a step-out hole, drilled about 50m west of the boundary of the outlined West Ayawilca orebody, it is interesting to see that the existing orebody extends to the west via the shallower intercepts, which are at the same depths, and have very decent width and grade as well.
There is a lot of consistency in the mineralization throughout the property, as almost any mineralization shallower than say 300m is relatively narrow (<10m) in width/thickness, veiny and hosted in sandstone. Hole A18-120 and A18-121 weren't mentioned in the highlights, so I assume these results weren't economic. As can be seen at the map of the latest drill collar locations, (very) economic results like A18-126 and A18-129 can be located very close to uneconomic results like A18-121, so a lot of drilling is needed to precisely define mineralized bounderies:
Figure 3. Map drill locations June 2018
It appears that A18-120 just remained outside the mineralized horizon, but when we start looking at the C-section, it becomes clear what the geologists were looking for: a stacked system of two or more potentially layered limestone host rock. They came to this concept after analyzing the cores more in detail on structural controls, and discovered a few low angle thrust faults west of West Ayawilca, in the large, semi-vertical North-South trending fault area (which runs west of West and South Ayawilca), potentially capable of laterally (horizontally) displacing the mineralized limestone:
Figure 4. Section C-C'
This is why hole A18-129 proved them right. As CEO Carman stated in the news release:
“The exceptional zinc grade in hole A18-129 is very exciting as it confirms Ayawilca mineralization can be very high-grade, while a repetition of the favourable Pucara limestone opens up a new exploration target at depth and also down-plunge of the new intercept. Previously, it was thought that the phyllite metamorphic rock represents a ‘floor’ to the zinc mineralization. Past drill holes were typically stopped a few metres into the phyllite, and some holes at Ayawilca may have been stopped prematurely.”
“The objectives of the drill program are to find additional high-grade zinc resources, as well as to improve the geological understanding of the Ayawilca deposit, which is evolving as more holes are drilled. The three-rig drill program is now focused on testing extensions of the zinc resources at West and South Ayawilca, including deeper repetitions of the limestone-hosted replacement mineralization, as well as possible connections of these areas with Central Ayawilca"
It must have been a good feeling as a geologist to see your theories confirmed with such strong results. On a sidenote: the holes A14-020 and A14-033 appeared to be ending in a mineralized envelope, apparently located at around the same depth as the new, spectacular intercept, which intrigued me. After looking into the corresponding news releases of 2014 and 2015, it showed that the deepest intercepts of these two holes were situated a good 70m more to the surface compared to A18-129:
"A14-20: 2.2 metres at 21.0% zinc from 164 metres depth; and 34.15 metres at 5.3% zinc from 179.85 metres depth, including 12.0 metres at 10.5% zinc from 179.85 metres depth; and 42 metres at 4.3% zinc from 268 metres depth;
A14-33: 77.1 metres at 4.0 % zinc from 268.0 metres depth, including 8.8 metres at 13.5 % zinc from 270.9 metres depth;"
So according to my view, and if these two holes ended in phyllite basement rock, the high grade intercept of A18-129 needs to be drawn in the section at greater depth, and the border between limestone and phyllite needs to be drawn a lot more angled, trending down to the right (eastern direction). This could indicate that a bigger/longer slab of limestone (and hopefully potentially more mineralization) could be located in this wedge between the two low angled faults that cut up the limestone exactly where it turns downward (anticline). CEO Carman wasn't sure of this but is looking into it with his team.
We discussed the new concept of layered limestone a bit more in-depth, and Carman had some interesting insights to share. For example, he and his geos are contemplating that one or both of the two low angle faults might actually be the feeder, or lead to the feeder, being the conduits transporting the mineralization. According to him, it is unusual to get this very high grade zinc and only zinc in it in this location, as existing drill results directly around it are more irregular, containing other metals like led and silver. As a rule of thumb, with a precipitation event, copper and tin mineralization crystallizes first, then zinc, then led and silver, the further you go to the boundaries of a deposit or mineralized zone. The purity of the zinc tells Carman that it must be closer to a feeder than the more mixed zinc/led/silver intercepts.
As these two faults trend down, it is anticipated that an eventual feeder system could reside somewhere below Central Ayawilca, and could even be the actual source of all Ayawilca mineralization. This means that the earlier concept of all mineralization coming from the east (Zone3 and further away) seems to be less likely, despite the more early stage copper and tin intercepts over there. For this reason, and not getting very meaningful zinc intercepts at this zone, Tinka management decided not to proceed with more Zone 3 drilling for now, and focus more on West and South. In the news release of May 24th, the announced Zone 3 drill results showed little zinc in for example the highly anticipated hole A18-113:
"20.3 metres at 1.26 % tin & 0.30% copper from 658.0 metres depth, including
Figure 5. Map drill locations May 2018
Holes A18-113 and A18-110 returned substantial amounts of (high grade) tin though, which could mean an interesting expansion of the existing tin tonnage. However, a hole that was actually pretty impressive in this news release was A18-118, drilled at West Ayawilca, stepping out about 50m:
"106.5 metres at 6.8 % zinc (uncut), 0.2 % lead, 17 g/t silver & 48 g/t indium from 237.3 metres"
Assuming continuous mineralization to West and a radius of 25m for this hole, I would like to estimate a hypothetical 1.5-2Mt of additional tonnage, bringing total tonnage to 45.5-46Mt at the moment (in the last April update I estimated 44.1Mt after reported intercepts). These were the highlights of the May 24th news release as a brief intermezzo, and I would like to continue with the new geological concept.
For now, management thinks that these low angle faults may actually run from West to South, and provide a wide and angled plane(s), acting as possible conduits. In order to test this concept, they are drilling several holes at the western part of West and South towards the big NW/SE fault, and one hole in between these deposits, named A18-134. Management hopes at least to find more high grade zinc in a displaced limestone area at the anticline, acting as a second mineralized layer, and possibly even more mineralized layers, and another goal is to try to connect West and South at depth through displaced mineralized limestone.
According to Carman, there is a particular order in time needed to get to the geology as it is now. He thinks the low angle faults were first, then the big NW/SE fault came, and after this the mineralization event took place. This created a question mark for me regarding the South deposit. Consensus is that South used to be part of Central, and was laterally displaced to the Southwest by a East-West running fault, after the mineralization event. But the NW/SE fault runs uninterupted when looking at the maps, with the anticline halting mineralization at the western side of South just as it did at the western side of West.
This isn't possible with the currently assumed order of events, unless the NW/SE fault line actually didn't run uninterupted in a more or less straight line, but was partly located much more to the east, and got shifted to the west when South started moving laterally as well. As a consequence, management had to pick very consciously a spot to test the connection between West and South, as South was moved, and therefore hole A18-134 was located more to the east to anticipate on all this. See light orange as the estimated original trajectory of the NW/SE fault line:
Figure 6. Map drill locations June 2018 and fault trajectories
Something must have happened, but it is not all clear cut. When looking at the greyish satellite pic which is the basis of the map, one sees a ridge running more or less at the projected 'old' fault trajectory. This is confusing but the current drilling will probably define the correct structural controls in this area.
More to the west the mineralization drops off quickly when the big north-west / south-east fault is encountered. This type of large faults can act as subvertical conduits for mineral precipitation, but more often than not they are filled with clay and other material that acts like a barrier. Carman thinks, as mineralization halts abruptly at the NE/SW fault, that this is in fact a barrier, and he wants to infill drill at a 50m grid spacing, and test the consistency of this barrier as well.
For now, the most important objective is to prove up the eventual repititiveness of the high grade intercept in the third dimension, parallel at the C section. When the geologists succeed in this, this could create a mineralized zone at West of 300m long, 50m wide laterally and 10m thick which could be about 0.5Mt. The next question of course would be if it would be high grade across the entire envelope, if such a high grade zone could be established at South, and between South and West, and finally if a feeder system could be discovered. Tonnage doesn't need to be big as the ore would be incredibly profitable, and very much suitable to front load a mining operation for rapid payback and very high IRR.
To get an idea of gross metal value: 30% zinc means US$759/t @$1.15/lb Zn which is the equivalent of 18.8g/t gold. One million tonnes of this material mined in the first year or two years could mean a good US$400M pre tax cash flow after opex, recovery, payability, G&A, penalties, treatment charges etc, which in itself would account for almost the entire capex in my models. Of course continuous 30%Zn mineralization would be optimistic, so I remained very conservative when modeling (adding around US$100M in total after tax NPV at base case with more additional tonnage). As a reminder, the basic data for my estimated hypothetical Ayawilca PEA were based on a peer comparison of economic studies. For this article, I added 2 more studies, the PEA of Fireweed Zinc and the PEA of Callinex Mines. The last one is an open pit project, but I added it anyway to get some insight in open pit numbers too. Here is part I:
Figure 7. Peer comparison economic studies part I
And part II:
Figure 8. Peer comparison economic studies part II
I consider the 50-60Mt target of Tinka management realistic after this recent development, so I modeled various discounted cash flows on this (6000tpd operation) with this new sensitivity table as a result:
Figure 9. Sensitivity Analysis
I consider a post-tax IRR of 25% at a conservative zinc price the minimum for a medium sized zinc project to be attractive for take over candidates. No wonder that Arizona's Taylor project got acquired recently, with an IRR of 42% @US$1.10/lb Zn which is stand out world class, and traded well above 50% of PEA NPV8 before and after the PEA came out. Economics and jurisdiction of Ayawilca are not as good, but should be able to provide sufficient upside for investors, as it would trade at 17% of hypothetical PEA NPV8 at the moment, if my calculations are correct of course. I view this project as the best available project behind Arizona's Taylor project. Nonetheless, I still used the US$1.15/lb zinc price for base case, as I consider this a solid target price for the future. Zinc has a tendency to spike for only a few years, and gravitate back to more modest levels:
Figure 10. Zinc price chart; source InfoMine
Looking at this chart, a new normal of US$1.00/lb wouldn't even be too conservative in my view, but considering the lack of good, new advanced projects shovel ready, a US$1.15/lb long term zinc price doesn't seem unrealistic.
According to CEO Carman, Tinka is planning to keep drilling until mid August with 3 rigs, which would mean another 8 to 10 holes. This might change when they hit something really spectacular, but this is the current schedule they have in mind now. After closing off the data for the upcoming resource update, the metallurgical test work results will be completed and published early Q4, and at the end of Q4 the Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) is planned. For now, management doesn't really have a tonnage target in mind, but they are aiming at roughly 50-60Mt.
The idea is to keep drilling during the PEA work, with one rig at Central Ayawilca, probably doing one deep, vertical hole in order to look for potential layered mineralization over there as well, and/or a possible feeder of it all. Management is also looking at deepening some existing holes at Central after the PEA is completed.
Some final information: Tinka is fully financed for the next 12 months at least, with C$15M of cash in the treasury. The issued and outstanding share count stands at 260.8M at the moment, and the fully diluted number is about 307M shares. At a current market cap of C$143M, there is still plenty of upside to be expected, as opex in Peru is very low in general, providing lots of margin of error on my estimates.
Hole A18-129 was a very interesting hole. It might not be the biggest overall mineralized intercept for grade times meters, but it seems to be the best indicator for a potential feeder system so far. Besides this, if the new mineralization concept could be verified along the west side of South and West Ayawilca, and hopefully in between, including the extremely high grade, this could imply a significant improvement for already impressive hypothetical PEA economics. Tinka Resources seems very much on its way to a 50Mt target, and this estimated tonnage could prove to be very profitable as well. In that case, upcoming PEA-generated NPV and IRR figures could firmly establish Tinka as the next take over target after Arizona Mining. This could be shaping up as a pretty interesting second half of this year.
I hope you will find this article interesting and useful, and will have further interest in my upcoming articles on mining. To never miss a thing, please subscribe to my free newsletter at www.criticalinvestor.eu, in order to get an email notice of my new articles soon after they are published.
The author is not a registered investment advisor, and has a long position in this stock. Tinka Resources is a sponsoring company. The views, opinions, estimates or forecasts regarding Tinka’s performance are those of the author alone and do not represent opinions, forecasts or predictions of Tinka or Tinka’s management. Tinka has not in any way endorsed the information, conclusions or recommendations provided by the author.
All facts are to be checked by the reader. For more information go to www.tinkaresources.com and read the company’s profile and official documents on www.sedar.com, also for important risk disclosures. This article is provided for information purposes only, and is not intended to be investment advice of any kind, and all readers are encouraged to do their own due diligence, and talk to their own licensed investment advisors prior to making any investment decisions.
Figure 11. Ayawilca project surroundings
This newsletter/article is not meant to be investment advice, as Criticalinvestor.eu (from now on website, newsletter, and all persons or organisations directly related to it, for example but not limited to: owner, editor, the Seekingalpha author The Critical Investor, publisher, host company, employees, associates, sponsoring companies) is no registered investment advisor. Therefore it is not intended to meet your specific individual investment needs and it is not tailored to your personal financial situation. This newsletter/article reflects the personal and therefore subjective views and opinions of Criticalinvestor.eu and nothing else. The information herein may not be complete, up to date or correct. This newsletter/article is provided in good faith but without any legal responsibility or obligation to provide future updates.
Through use of this website and its newsletter viewing or using you agree to hold Criticalinvestor.eu harmless and to completely release them from any and all liability due to any and all loss (monetary or otherwise), damage (monetary or otherwise), or injury (monetary or otherwise) that you may incur.
You understand that Criticalinvestor.eu could be an investor and/or active trader, meaning that Criticalinvestor.eu could buy and sell certain securities at all times, more specific any or all of the stocks mentioned in own newsletters/articles and other own content like the Watchlist, Leveraged List, etc.
No part of this newsletter/article may be reproduced, copied, emailed, faxed, or distributed (in any form) without the express written permission of Criticalinvestor.eu. Everything contained herein is subject to international copyright protection. The full disclaimer can be found here.