THE CRITICAL INVESTOR

Dear subscriber,

Unfortunately there was some kind of first time screw-up from the article editor which automatically adjusted the drill results from the W2 project after importing the text to lower numbers, by leaving out any numbers before a . so for example 220.6m became 6m. Makes a big difference of course.

Here are the correct numbers, which are already corrected in the article as well:

• 220.6 m of 0.56% CuEq or 0.956 g/t PdEq (LH-01-06)
• 151.6 m of 0.57% CuEq or 0.971 g/t PdEq including 17 m of 1.08% CuEq or 1.86 g/t PdEq (LH-01-05)
• 42 m of 1.02% CuEq or 1.8 g/t PdEq including a high grade 4.5 m section of 4.52 g/t PdEq (LH-01-02)

My sincere apologies for any misunderstanding this might have caused.

Future articles will all be doublechecked to avoid these situations.

Regards,

The Critical Investor